Piestewa Peak in the beautiful Phoenix Mountain Preserve

Larry C. Adams, CPA
Business Solutions With Common Sense

| Business Services | Experience | Books | Articles | Links | Site Map | Home |


Larry C. Adams, CPA

Certified Public Accountant
 Certified Fraud Examiner
Phoenix, Arizona USA
E-mail: fraudwritr@aol.com


 

15th Year of
Fraud In Other Words
"Insightful and humorous"
Magazine article archive
Free updates
Fraud dictionary
 


 

www.larry-adams.com
 Search this site

FAQs
 Guilty pleasures

 

September 2007 Fraud Terminology Topics
Botherder, Clawback, Cybersmear, Demurrer,
Fourflusher, IQEX, and Won't Hold Water
 

One-fourth of the 600 million computers in the world
are part of unauthorized botnets that can be used for malicious or criminal purposes.

 

Fraud In Other Words
Professional Jargon and Uncensored Street Slang
by Larry C. Adams, CFE, CPA, CIA, CISA


 

Botherder
A hacker who creates a botnet and uses that unauthorized network of other people’s computers for malicious or criminal purposes. The botherder takes advantage of security weaknesses in those computers and turns them into his zombies or bots. A botherder is a hacker who creates an unauthorized network of other people's computers for malicious or criminal purposes.A botherder downloads hidden robot software (also called bots) onto thousands of computers worldwide and controls them remotely. A botherder or botmaster can use the zombie computers to perform identity theft, distributed denial of service (DDOS) attacks, phishing, click fraud, or the mass distribution of spam and spyware. It can be time-consuming and expensive to trace a botherder when his identity and point of origin are masked by redirected transmissions between multiple layers of zombies.
    
At the 2007 World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, Vinton Cerf, one of the founding fathers of the Internet, warned that up to one-fourth of the 600 million computers in the world are already part of botnets.
     Most owners of compromised computers are unknowing or unwitting victims who may not realize their equipment or personal information has been exploited. The U.S. Department of Justice (USDOJ) and the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) plan to notify a million owners that the owners’ computers were identified as part of a botnet. Dutch police also uncovered a network of 1.5 million compromised computers.
     A botherder in California earned $107,000 in fraudulent commissions by installing adware (advertising software) on users’ computers without their consent. He used the money to buy more computer servers to conduct his illegal activities. A Texas botherder operated a botnet that infected Chicago area hospitals and tens of thousands of computers worldwide. A Kentucky botherder sent a high volume of traffic to intended recipients to cause damage by impairing the availability of their systems. A Seattle botherder sent tens of millions of unsolicited e-mail messages to advertise his Web site of services and products.
     Fraud examiners can encourage their clients and employers to avoid becoming victims of a botherder by keeping their firewalls turned on, by updating their operating system software, antispyware, and antivirus software so they have recent security fixes, and by turning off computers when they aren’t in use.
“Botherder Dealt Record Prison Sentence for Selling and Spreading Malicious Computer Code,” U.S. Department of Justice, May 8, 2006, www.usdoj.gov/criminal/cybercrime/anchetaSent.htm.

 

Clawback
A voluntary, written agreement between opposing parties of a civil litigation case to protect the privilege, confidentiality, and privacy of electronically stored information (ESI) during the “e-discovery” process in preparation for trial. A clawback agreement allows the requesting party to have a “quick peek” at large volumes of the opponent’s reasonably accessible electronic documents. After the quick peek, the requesting party identifies the specific documents it wants the opponent to produce. The producing party then reviews those selected documents for privilege.
A clawback agreement helps protect the privilege and confidentiality of electronically store information.     The producing party does little or no prior review of the original large volume of electronic documents. Therefore, the producing party is permitted to “claw back” or demand the return of privileged information if the requesting party tries to use it. It’s easy to miss privileged communications buried in long chains of e-mail, photos, and documents with invisible metadata, hidden formulas, links, references, and comments.
     To prevent an unintentional waiver of privilege or loss of protection of the information, a clawback agreement needs to consider the differences in privilege laws among jurisdictions.
     An estimated 70 percent of an organization’s documents are stored in electronic form. A clawback or nonwaiver agreement can reduce the delay and costs caused by discovery. Reasonable precautions should be taken to avoid inadvertent production of privileged information. Some companies hire an “e-discovery vendor” to retrieve, inventory, organize, and index electronic records, and then put them into a reviewable format for litigation purposes.
     Other types of clawback agreements are used for recovering taxes, pension benefits, insurance benefits, dividends for project financing, claims for legal judgments, and unfair distributions of profits.
Andrew Rhys Davies, “Clawback Agreements Lose Their Grip in Court,” The National Law Journal, July 24, 2006, http://www.law.com/jsp/ihc/PubArticleIHC.jsp?id=1153472732113.

 

Cybersmear
A practice in which individuals post malicious messages about businesses in online forums, bulletin boards, chat rooms, and blogs. Their motives might be personal or for profit. Disgruntled workers try to hurt businesses by posting their grievances. Business executives have used cybersmear tactics to hurt their competitors.Short sellers attempt to manipulate stock prices by posting damaging statements online. Some cyber-perpetrators post their suspicions about unethical dumping of stock, corrupt management, market manipulation, or deep financial troubles. Other cybersmear campaigns include phony press releases about layoffs, mergers, and divestures. Anonymous free speech on the Internet can be a source of misleading information that harms the reputations of executives and businesses. The Internet has accelerated the way the world stock markets react to good and bad information.
     From 1999 to 2006, the chief executive officer of a natural and organic food market chain posted anonymous attacks against a rival company in online financial forums. The postings claimed the rival’s management didn’t know what it was doing, the company had no future, and the stock price would drop. In 2007, the CEO’s chain announced it would buy the rival.
     To detect cybersmears, some companies assign their own investor relations department to monitor
stock-chat message boards and the Internet. Other organizations hire public relations firms or monitoring services to notify them about positive and negative postings.
      The cost of identifying a person posting negative messages can range from US$15,000 to US$25,000. Some firms hire less expensive private investigators to track them down. Some companies have pursued litigation against the cybersmear perpetrators for libel, defamation, and financial damages.
A. J. Cataldo, Larry N. Killough, “Is Your Firm Safe from Cybersmear?” Strategic Finance, February 7, 2003, http://accounting.smartpros.com/
x37013.xml.

 

Demurrer
A pleading filed with the court by a defendant who contests the legal sufficiency of the plaintiff’s complaint. It requests the court to dismiss the case without the defendant admitting or denying the truth of the alleged facts. In many jurisdictions, a demurrer is called a “motion to dismiss.” Demurrer is derived from the Latin verb “demoror” that means to block, delay or wait.
       A plaintiff’s fraud claim is easily made, but difficult to support. The specific allegations of fraud must be sufficient to convince the court that the accuser isn’t merely attempting subterfuge and trying to take advantage of the defendant.
       A witness might file a “demurrer to interrogatories” to carefully explain his objection or reason for failing to answer a written question as part of discovery in a lawsuit.
       A party to a case might file a “demurrer to evidence” to object that the evidence is legally insufficient to make the case.
Shared Communication Services v. Albert M. Greenfield & Company, Inc., November 19, 2001, http://courts.phila.gov/pdf/cpcvcomprg/
shared.pdf.


 

Fourflusher
Anyone who bluffs or pretends, especially someone who pretends to be more than he or she is while living on money borrowed from others. A person who makes false claims and misrepresentations.
       In poker, a flush is five cards all of the same suit. A flush is potentially a winning hand. A four-card flush is worthless. In open-handed poker, a player is in excellent position to bluff when he has four cards of the same suit face up on the table. No one knows whether he has a fifth card of the same suit as his concealed “hole” card.
      Gamblers in the American West bluffed so often with four-card flushes, the term fourflusher spread from the gaming tables to politer society in the 1890s.
     Today, casinos still see players trying to cheat with a four-card flush. In one scam, the player lays his hand down with black four spades and partially conceals the fifth card, a black club. Quickly, his accomplice tosses his cards down on top of his partner’s, moves the club and replaces it with a spade so a five-card flush is showing. A little acting and a few vocal curses are used to distract the dealer and other players from noticing the switch.
Robert Hendrickson, QPB Encyclopedia of Word and Phrase Origins, Facts on File, Inc., New York, 1997, page 262.

 

IQEX
The International Qualification Examination (IQEX) is taken by qualified accountants in Canada, Australia, Ireland, and Mexico who want to earn the Certified Public Accountant (CPA) designation in the United States. The exam assesses their competence in accounting principles, auditing standards, commercial law, income tax law, and professional ethics unique to the United States.
     The American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) prepares the computer-based test that can be taken outside the United States, instead of taking the Uniform CPA Exam within the United States. The International Qualification Examination is administered by the National Association of State Boards of Accountancy (NASBA). Agreements for reciprocal licensing of accountants have been established with the AICPA, NASBA, state accountancy boards, and credentialing organizations in various countries.
     Public accountants in Mexico with the title of Contador Publico Certificado (CPC) and CPAs in the United States who want to earn professional reciprocity in Canada can take the Chartered Accountants Reciprocity Examination (CARE).
     International reciprocity simplifies cross-border practice and enhances the prestige of professional accountancy. Many accountants have earned an additional international designation – Certified Fraud Examiner.
IQEX, www.nasba.org/nasbaweb/NASBAWeb.nsf/wpeip?openform, June 23, 2007.

 

Won’t Hold Water
Anything that can’t pass the test for integrity and soundness. The phrase “won’t hold water” also is used to describe an argument that is flawed or an item that has a defect.
       The phrase is rooted in Roman mythology about the prestigious Vestal Virgins. Because of their incorruptible character, the Vestals were entrusted with safekeeping state documents, public treaties, testaments, and wills including those of Julius Caesar and Mark Antony. One of the ceremonial duties of these priestesses was to draw pure water in handmade clay vases from the sacred Tiber River and bring it to the Temple of Vesta.
Lies are like the holes in a sieve that won't hold water.       Tuccia (Tutia) was a Vestal who was accused of violating her oath of celibacy. To prove her innocence, Tuccia was asked to perform a difficult task by the Pontifex Maximus, the high priest of the Ancient Roman College of Pontiffs. He required Tuccia to carry water from the river to the temple using a sieve instead of a vase. If the sieve held the water, Tuccia would be innocent. If it didn’t hold water, she would be guilty and punished severely. Miraculously, Tuccia passed the test.
       A fraudster tells many lies. As a fraud examiner discovers the truth, those lies like are like holes in a sieve. Eventually, the fraudster’s story won’t hold water.
World Mythology Encyclopedia, Larousse,www.worldmythology.ws/
world-mythology-encyclopedia/mythology0169.php, July 7, 2007.

 

ã Copyright 2007 Larry C. Adams. All rights reserved.
 

This article is in the September/October 2007 issue of Fraud Magazine,
the Journal of the Association of Certified Fraud Examiners.
 

 Magazine Article Archive
Fraud Dictionary

Free update service
 


| Business Services | Experience | Books | Articles | Links | Site Map | Home |
Slide your cursor over the images and hyperlinks to view captions and screen tips with Internet Explorer.
This site is written and maintained by Larry Adams. It is best viewed on Internet Explorer 6.0 or Netscape 7.0 or higher.
Copyright © 1993-2008 Larry C. Adams and his licensors. All rights reserved.